Chih v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 13-985V
    Filed: August 22, 2014
    Not for Publication
    *************************************
    CHING-PING CHIH,                               *
    *
    Petitioner,                      *     Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on
    *     stipulation of facts
    v.                                            *
    *
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                            *
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                            *
    *
    Respondent.                      *
    *
    *************************************
    F. John Caldwell, Jr., Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.
    Claudia B. Gangi, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    MILLMAN, Special Master
    DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1
    On August 21, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation of facts in which they agreed on an
    appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case.
    In accordance with the General Order #9 requirement, petitioner asserts that she did not
    incur any costs in pursuit of her petition. Petitioner submitted her request for attorneys’ fees and
    costs to respondent. During informal discussions, respondent raised objections to certain items in
    petitioner’s application. Based on these objections, petitioner amends her application for
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this
    case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal
    Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 
    116 Stat. 2899
    ,
    2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made
    available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is
    privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and
    move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,
    agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall
    redact such material from public access.
    attorneys’ fees and costs to $13,696.22. Respondent does not object to this amount. The
    undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $13,696.22,
    representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a
    check payable jointly to petitioner and Maglio, Christopher & Toale, P.A., in the amount of
    $13,696.22.
    In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the
    court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    Dated: August 22, 2014                                                             s/ Laura D. Millman
    Laura D. Millman
    Special Master
    2
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
    jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:13-vv-00985

Judges: Laura D Millman

Filed Date: 9/12/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021