Maynilda v. Gonzales ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 04-2409
    LIA MAYNILDA; HERRY JAYA LIENARDY LIE,
    Petitioners,
    versus
    ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals. (A79-466-302; A79-466-303)
    Submitted:   March 30, 2005                 Decided:   April 7, 2005
    Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Lia Maynilda, Herry Jaya Lienardy Lie, Petitioners Pro Se.   M.
    Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Song E. Park, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
    JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Lia Maynilda and Herry Jaya Lienardy Lie, natives and
    citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of two separate orders
    of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the immigration
    judge’s denial of their requests for asylum and withholding of
    removal. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility
    for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was
    so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the
    requisite fear of persecution.”      INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 
    502 U.S. 478
    , 483-84 (1992).   We have reviewed the evidence of record and
    conclude that the Petitioners fail to show that the evidence
    compels a contrary result.     Having failed to qualify for asylum,
    the Petitioners cannot meet the higher standard to qualify for
    withholding of removal. Camara v. Ashcroft, 
    378 F.3d 361
    , 367 (4th
    Cir. 2004).
    Accordingly,   we   deny   the   petition   for   review.   We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-2409

Filed Date: 4/7/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021