Hayward v. Dist. Ct. (Butler) ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                   Moreover, this court has held that the right to appeal is typically an
    adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief.     Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88
    P.3d at 841.
    Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our
    intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. NRAP 21(b)(1);
    Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at
    844. Accordingly, we
    ORDER the petition DENIED.
    Hardesty
    OVA'            ,J.
    Douglas
    J.
    cc:   Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge
    Christensen Law Offices, LLC
    Upson Smith/Las Vegas
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A    ea
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 66039

Filed Date: 9/16/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021