United States v. Lorenzo Perez-Vasquez ( 2014 )

Case: 13-41373 Document: 00512774050 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/18/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-41373
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
September 18, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
LORENZO PEREZ-VASQUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:13-CR-323-1
Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Lorenzo Perez-Vasquez has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Perez-Vasquez has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently
developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Perez-Vasquez’s claim of
ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 13-41373 Document: 00512774050 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/18/2014
No. 13-41373
without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829,
841 (5th Cir. 2014), petition for cert. filed (June 4, 2014) (No. 13-10484).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as Perez-Vasquez’s response. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
Perez-Vasquez’s motion for remand is DENIED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
2