United States v. Torres , 190 F. App'x 393 ( 2006 )

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 13, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-40147
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KATHY TORRES,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:05-CR-674
--------------------
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Kathy Torres
raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.
Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000), which held that
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), did not render 21
U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional on its face, and by United States
v. Riascos-Cuenu, 428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005),
petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). which held
that a challenge to the district court’s order requiring the
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-40147
-2-
defendant to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a
condition of supervised release is not ripe for review on direct
appeal. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.