United States v. Vazquez , 195 F. App'x 255 ( 2006 )

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 28, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-51593
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARCO A. VAZQUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 1:05-CR-66
--------------------
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Marco A. Vazquez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and
sentence for possession of an unregistered short-barreled shotgun
in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861(d), 5845(a) and 5871. He
contends that the 21-month sentence imposed at the low end of the
properly calculated guideline range was unreasonable because it
failed to account for the severe immigration consequences he
faced.
Vazquez asked for leniency based on the immigration
consequences of his conviction in his sentencing memorandum and
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-51593
-2-
at sentencing. Although it was not explicitly mentioned as a
reason for the sentence imposed, the district court implicitly
considered the possibility of Vazquez’s permanent removal when
it sentenced Vazquez at the low end of the guideline range.
See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir.),
cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005). After imposing sentence, the
district court stated that Vazquez’s conviction was “substantial”
because it could lead to his removal from the United States.
Therefore, Vazquez’s sentence within the properly calculated
guideline range was presumptively reasonable, and Vazquez has
failed to demonstrate that his sentence was unreasonable. See
United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554-55 (5th Cir. 2006).
AFFIRMED.