Cruz De Gomez v. Gonzales , 202 F. App'x 698 ( 2006 )

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-60894
Summary Calendar
MARIA FELICITAS CRUZ DE GOMEZ, also known as Felicitas Cruz
De Gomez,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
--------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A77 534 904
--------------------
Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Maria Felicitas Cruz De Gomez (Gomez) petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA’s) decision denying
adjustment of status. We hold that substantial evidence does not
compel a reversal of the immigration judge’s finding that Gomez
did not enter the United States under advance parole and was
therefore statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status. See
Majd v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d 590, 594 (5th Cir. 2006); Mortera-Cruz
v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 246, 249, 256 (5th Cir. 2005). We further
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-60894
-2-
hold that under the circumstances of her case, it was not
unreasonable for the immigration judge to require Gomez to
provide evidence corroborating her testimony that she had entered
the United States under advance parole. Cf. Zhao v. Gonzales,
404 F.3d 295, 304 (5th Cir. 2005).
Finally, Gomez’s untimely request to toll or stay the period
of voluntary departure is refused. Cf. Bocova v. Gonzales, 412
F.3d 257, 266, 268 (1st Cir. 2005); Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d
1157, 1159 (9th Cir. 2004).
PETITION DENIED.