Jason Drew v. Michael McCall , 584 F. App'x 92 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-7083
    JASON ROBERT DREW,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    MICHAEL MCCALL,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Anderson.    Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
    (8:13-cv-00858-MGL)
    Submitted:   September 25, 2014            Decided:   September 30, 2014
    Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jason Robert Drew, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jason Robert Drew seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order     dismissing       as    untimely       his   
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
         (2012)
    petition.         We     dismiss   the   appeal       for   lack     of    jurisdiction
    because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
    Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of
    the     district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal,
    Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends
    the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
    appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).                              “[T]he timely
    filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
    requirement.”          Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007).
    The district court’s order was entered on the docket
    on June 10, 2014.           The notice of appeal was filed on July 17,
    2014. *    Because Drew failed to file a timely notice of appeal or
    to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we
    dismiss the appeal.             We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts     and    legal    contentions    are      adequately       presented    in   the
    *
    For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date
    appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could
    have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to
    the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 
    487 U.S. 266
    (1988).
    2
    materials   before   this   court   and   argument   would   not    aid   the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-7083

Citation Numbers: 584 F. App'x 92

Filed Date: 9/30/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023