Nelson Vasquez v. Jefferson Sessions , 677 F. App'x 416 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION                          FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       FEB 22 2017
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    NELSON NOEL VASQUEZ,                             No.   13-74441
    Petitioner,                     Agency No. A097-883-818
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    JEFF B. SESSIONS, Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted February 14, 2017**
    Before:       GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
    Nelson Noel Vasquez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se
    for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his
    motion to reconsider and reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is
    governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    motion to reopen or reconsider. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 
    400 F.3d 785
    , 791 (9th
    Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
    The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Vasquez’s motion to
    reconsider because he failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s prior
    order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).
    We lack jurisdiction to review Vasquez’s unexhausted contentions regarding
    compliance with Matter of Lozada, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988), and
    administrative closure. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 
    358 F.3d 674
    , 678 (9th Cir. 2004)
    (court lacks jurisdiction to review the merits of a legal claim not presented in
    administrative proceedings below).
    We do not consider the extra-record evidence submitted for the first time
    with Vasquez’s opening brief. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(A) (judicial review is
    limited to the administrative record); Dent v. Holder, 
    627 F.3d 365
    , 371 (9th Cir.
    2010) (stating standard for review of out-of-record evidence).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
    2                                    13-74441
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-74441

Citation Numbers: 677 F. App'x 416

Filed Date: 2/22/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023