United States v. Israel Sanchez-Ensaldo , 583 F. App'x 319 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 13-50910      Document: 00512806830         Page: 1    Date Filed: 10/17/2014
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-50910
    Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    October 17, 2014
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    ISRAEL SANCHEZ-ENSALDO,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:13-CR-1074-1
    Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Israel Sanchez-Ensaldo appeals his 18-month sentence following his
    conviction for importation of and possession with intent to distribute
    marijuana. He argues that the district court erred in denying a U.S.S.G.
    § 3B1.2 reduction for his minor role in the offense. Sanchez-Ensaldo contends
    that he was entitled to the reduction because he acted merely as a courier.
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-50910   Document: 00512806830     Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/17/2014
    No. 13-50910
    The district court’s refusal to grant Sanchez-Ensaldo a two-level
    reduction for being a minor participant was not clearly erroneous. See United
    States v. Villanueva, 
    408 F.3d 193
    , 203 n.9 (5th Cir. 2005). Sanchez-Ensaldo’s
    courier status did not entitle him to a role adjustment because a defendant
    may be a courier without being “substantially less culpable than the average
    participant.” See United States v. Brown, 
    54 F.3d 234
    , 241 (5th Cir. 1995);
    United States v. Nevarez-Arreola, 
    885 F.2d 243
    , 245 (5th Cir. 1989). Sanchez-
    Ensaldo’s attempt to import a gross weight of 66.92 kilograms of marijuana
    provided an indispensable service to the drug-trafficking offense and was
    essential to its success. See Brown, 
    54 F.3d at 241
    ; see also United States v.
    Buenrostro, 
    868 F.2d 135
    , 138 (5th Cir. 1989). Moreover, Sanchez-Ensaldo was
    to be paid a large sum of money for his role in the activity and was solely
    responsible for transporting the marijuana to its final destination in
    Albuquerque, New Mexico. Based on the foregoing, it cannot be said that
    Sanchez-Ensaldo was peripheral to the advancement of the criminal activity
    and thus a minor participant. See Villanueva, 
    408 F.3d at 204
    .
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-50910

Citation Numbers: 583 F. App'x 319

Filed Date: 10/17/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023