Burkholder v. Danbury Printing Litho, No. 29 99 04 (Feb. 14, 1992) , 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 1289 ( 1992 )


Menu:
  • [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The briefs and documentary evidence submitted by both sides have been considered carefully by the court despite the length of this decision.

    Motions for summary judgment are not well designed for cases with complicated factual issues. They are also unsuited for cases where motive or intent of one of the parties is a material issue. Batick v. Seymour, 186 Conn. 632, 646-47. While the plaintiff has a weak case, it cannot be determined at this time, based on the evidence presented, that a verdict would be directed for the defendant at trial. Id., 247.

    The motion is denied.

    Robert A. Fuller, Judge

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 29 99 04

Citation Numbers: 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 1289

Judges: ROBERT A. FULLER, JUDGE. CT Page 1290

Filed Date: 2/14/1992

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021