McKeever v. Fiore, No. Cv99-033 65 35 S (Jan. 3, 2002) , 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 65 ( 2002 )


Menu:
  • [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

    ARTICULATION
    The defendants have moved for articulation "as to whether the court intended the decision to operate as an interlocutory judgment or to [sic] liability or as a final, appealable judgment." The motion may be granted. CT Page 66

    The intention of the court is irrelevant. Counsel advised it prior to the commencement of the hearing that the parties were only interested in the amount of the debt and requested a finding thereon, as substantially appears in footnote 1. Since the action was brought as a foreclosure, several salient features or findings were not made. There was no appraisal of the mortgaged property, and no finding value was made. There was no judgment of foreclosure with law days or sale date set. The judgment is certainly incomplete as a foreclosure and necessarily should be regarded as an interlocutory judgment as to the amount of the debt only.

    Moraghan, J.T.R.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. CV99-033 65 35 S

Citation Numbers: 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 65

Judges: MORAGHAN, JUDGE TRIAL REFEREE.

Filed Date: 1/3/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021