Sfr Investments Pool 1 v. Wells Fargo Bank ( 2014 )

 VACATE the order denying preliminary injunctive relief,
REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss, AND REMAND this
matter for proceedings consistent with this order.
Pickering
J.
Saitta
PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners
association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR
Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the
disposition of this appeal.
ItC1241
Parraguirre
, J.
cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge
David A. Rosenberg
Howard Kim & Associates
Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A