Ln Management v. Wells Fargo Bank ( 2014 )

 interpretation of the controlling law and did not reach the other issues
colorably asserted. Accordingly, we
VACATE the order denying preliminary injunctive relief AND
REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this order. 1
geku tiA, J.
Pickering
J.
Saitta
PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC V.
U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners
association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR
Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the
disposition of this appeal.
a7
—1-4 J.
Parraguirre
cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge
Kerry P. Faughnan
Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
1 The injunction imposed by our September 20, 2013, order is
vacated.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) I9474