Gery Scott v. Lorie Davis, Director , 670 F. App'x 322 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 16-10136      Document: 00513755887         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/10/2016
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 16-10136                              FILED
    Summary Calendar                    November 10, 2016
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    GERY LEE SCOTT,
    Petitioner-Appellant
    v.
    LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL
    JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,
    Respondent-Appellee
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:16-CV-20
    Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Gery Lee Scott, Texas prisoner # 1123905, seeks leave to proceed in
    forma pauperis (IFP) to appeal the district court’s transfer of his 28 U.S.C.
    § 2254 application as successive and unauthorized. Scott was convicted of
    injury to a child-bodily injury and sentenced to 35 years of imprisonment. He
    raised claims challenging his conviction and sentence on the basis of an
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-10136    Document: 00513755887      Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/10/2016
    No. 16-10136
    allegedly unlawful sentence enhancement as well as the state and federal
    postconviction proceedings.
    This appeal is frivolous and without merit because the district court
    correctly determined that the § 2254 application was successive and
    unauthorized under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). See § 2254(a); Leal Garcia v.
    Quarterman, 
    573 F.3d 214
    , 222 (5th Cir. 2009); Moore v. Dretke, 
    369 F.3d 844
    ,
    846 (5th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, Scott’s motions for IFP and appointment of
    counsel are DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5TH CIR.
    R. 42.2; FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(5); Carson v. Polley, 
    689 F.2d 562
    , 586 (5th Cir.
    1982).
    This is Scott’s third unsuccessful attempt to challenge his conviction and
    sentence. He is WARNED that future frivolous or repetitive filings will result
    in the imposition of sanctions.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-10136

Citation Numbers: 670 F. App'x 322

Filed Date: 11/10/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023