Martinez (Reddy) v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                    appellant failed to demonstrate any detrimental error to cumulate. Our
    review of the record reveals that the district court's factual findings are
    supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly wrong, and
    appellant has not demonstrated that the district court erred as a matter of
    law. See Strickland v. Washington, 
    466 U.S. 668
    , 687 (1984) (establishing
    two-part test for ineffective assistance of counsel); Kirksey v. State, 
    112 Nev. 980
    , 987, 
    923 P.2d 1102
    , 1107 (1996) (adopting the test in
    Strickland); see also Means v. State, 
    120 Nev. 1001
    , 1012, 
    103 P.3d 25
    , 33
    (2004) (petitioner must prove the facts underlying his claims of ineffective-
    assistance by a preponderance of the evidence). Accordingly, we
    ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'
    Hardesty
    Douglas
    r_
    .4 j.
    t
    cc:   Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge
    Nguyen & Lay
    Attorney General/Carson City
    Clark County District Attorney
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    3-The fast track statement does not comply with the formatting
    requirements of NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4) because it is not
    paginated. We caution respondent's counsel that failure to comply with
    the applicable rules when filing briefs in this court may result in the
    imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A 7s0944
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 65670

Filed Date: 11/12/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021