Wayne Gordon v. Leon Regan , 669 F. App'x 249 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •       Case: 16-30280          Document: 00513706100              Page: 1      Date Filed: 10/05/2016
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    No. 16-30280
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    Summary Calendar                               October 5, 2016
    Lyle W. Cayce
    WAYNE GORDON,                                                                                Clerk
    Plaintiff – Appellant
    v.
    LEON REGAN; CITADEL BUILDERS, L.L.C.; UNIDENTIFIED PARTY;
    TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA,
    improperly named Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of American,
    Incorporated,
    Defendants - Appellees
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    WAYNE GORDON
    Plaintiff – Appellant
    v.
    LEON REGAN; CITADEL BUILDERS, L.L.C.; UNIDENTIFIED PARTY;
    TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICAN,
    INCORPORATED
    Defendants - Appellees
    Appeals from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 2:15-CV-1979
    Case: 16-30280       Document: 00513706100         Page: 2    Date Filed: 10/05/2016
    No. 16-30280
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Wayne Gordon appeals, pro se, from a magistrate judge’s order deferring
    initial disclosures and the district court’s without-prejudice dismissal
    conditioned on execution of settlement agreement. The Court’s examination of
    the record reveals that there is no such order by a magistrate judge, and even
    if there were, it is not a final judgment and was not appealed to the district
    court. 1 Moreover, the district court’s dismissal from which Gordon appeals was
    a dismissal without prejudice as the district court retained jurisdiction to
    enforce the terms of the settlement. 2 Even if we construe Gordon’s appeal to be
    from the district court’s final dismissal with prejudice, he consented to that
    dismissal as a term of the settlement he agreed to. 3 Thus, this Court lacks
    jurisdiction. The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    1 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Central Progressive Bank v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 
    658 F.2d 377
    ,
    383 (5th Cir. 1981).
    2 LeCompte v. Mr. Chip, Inc., 
    528 F.2d 601
    , 603 (5th Cir. 1976).
    3 Tel-Phonic Services, Inc. v. TBS Int’l, Inc., 
    975 F.2d 1134
    , 1137 (5th Cir. 1992).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-30280

Citation Numbers: 669 F. App'x 249

Filed Date: 10/5/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023