United States v. James Rudzavice ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • Case: 20-10536      Document: 00515679678         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/18/2020
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit                              United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 20-10536                       December 18, 2020
    Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    United States of America,
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    James L. Rudzavice,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:07-CR-138-1
    USDC No. 4:20-CV-505
    Before Wiener, Southwick, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:*
    James Rudzavice was convicted of child pornography offenses and
    sentenced to 360 months in prison. United States v. Rudzavice, 
    586 F.3d 310
    ,
    312-13 (5th Cir. 2009). He appeals from the district court’s denial of a motion
    *
    Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
    Case: 20-10536        Document: 00515679678        Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/18/2020
    No. 20-10536
    for compassionate release under 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c)(1)(A), in which he
    argued that the threat of COVID-19 in prison constituted extraordinary and
    compelling reasons for release. He asserts on appeal that he has already
    contracted COVID-19 once and fears reinfection. He also asserts that the
    district court was biased, and he seeks a remand for reconsideration by a
    different judge.
    We need not decide whether the risk of reinfection constitutes an
    extraordinary and compelling reason for compassionate release because the
    district court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that Rudzavice
    remained a danger to the safety of others and that his immediate release after
    serving less than half of his sentence would not be in the interest of justice
    and would minimize the seriousness of his crimes. See United States v.
    Chambliss, 
    948 F.3d 691
    , 692-93 (5th Cir. 2020).
    The judgment is AFFIRMED. Rudzavice’s motion for appointment
    of counsel and all of his other requests for relief are DENIED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-10536

Filed Date: 12/18/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/19/2020