United States v. Cornett ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 00-10139
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    RONALD CORNETT,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:98-CR-151-6-X
    --------------------
    October 17, 2000
    Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Ronald Cornett appeals the district court’s enhancement of
    his base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2S1.3(b)(1).
    Concluding that Cornett waived his right to appeal, we dismiss
    the appeal as frivolous.    Cornett’s first contention that a
    waiver-of-appeal provision is not valid where the sentence is
    unknown is foreclosed by our decision in United States v.
    Melancon, 
    972 F.2d 566
    , 567 (5th Cir. 1992), in which we held
    that a defendant may waive his right to appeal, and that
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 00-10139
    -2-
    uncertainty of a sentence does not render such a waiver
    uninformed.
    We also conclude that the district court’s failure to
    admonish Cornett specifically about the waiver does not render
    the waiver unknowing or involuntary.     The waiver was recited
    orally at the plea hearing, and Cornett confirmed to the court
    that the plea agreement as summarized was the agreement as he
    understood it.      See United States v. Portillo, 
    18 F.3d 290
    , 292
    (5th Cir. 1994).     We decline Cornett’s invitation to reconsider
    our holdings in either Melancon or Portillo as one panel may not
    overrule the prior decision of another panel.      See Barber v.
    Johnson, 
    145 F.3d 234
    , 237 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    525 U.S. 1005
    (1998).    We further note that Cornett has pointed to no
    evidence suggesting that his waiver was not, in fact, knowing or
    voluntary.    Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal as frivolous.     See
    5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
    DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 00-10139

Filed Date: 10/17/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021