United States v. Contee , 328 F. App'x 969 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    July 15, 2009
    No. 08-50585
    Summary Calendar               Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    WILLIAM COURTNEY CONTEE,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 7:06-CR-151-1
    Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    William Courtney Contee, federal prisoner # 34683-177, pleaded guilty in
    2006 to conspiracy to distribute and to possess with the intent to distribute 50
    grams or more of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and he was
    sentenced to 250 months. He now appeals the reduced 240-month sentence he
    received following the district court’s sua sponte 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion
    *
    Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
    should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 08-50585
    based on the retroactive amendments to the crack cocaine guidelines. The
    sentence imposed represents the relevant statutory mandatory minimum.
    For the first time on appeal, Contee argues that the mandatory minimum
    strips district courts of the power to consider the sentencing factors of 18 U.S.C.
    § 3553(a) and is therefore unconstitutional under United States v. Booker, 
    543 U.S. 220
    (2005). His claim is without merit. A district court cannot impose a
    sentence lower than the statutory minimum following the grant of a § 3582(c)(2)
    motion. See Kimbrough v. United States, 
    128 S. Ct. 558
    , 574 (2007); United
    States v. Gomez-Herrera, 
    523 F.3d 554
    , 559 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    129 S. Ct. 624
    (2008). Contee makes no argument that he meets the limited circumstances for
    a sentence below the statutory minimum. See United States v. Harper, 
    527 F.3d 396
    , 411 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    129 S. Ct. 212
    (2008). Accordingly, the district
    court’s order imposing the statutory minimum sentence is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-50585

Citation Numbers: 328 F. App'x 969

Judges: Davis, Garza, Per Curiam, Prado

Filed Date: 7/15/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023