United States v. Robert Moore ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 20-10275      Document: 00515513262         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/03/2020
    REVISED August 3, 2020
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 20-10275                             August 3, 2020
    Conference Calendar
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    ROBERT DARREN MOORE,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:19-CR-432-1
    Before JONES, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    The attorney appointed to represent Robert Darren Moore has moved for
    leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
    
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
    632 F.3d 229
     (5th Cir. 2011).
    Moore has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us
    to make a fair evaluation of Moore’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel;
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 20-10275    Document: 00515513262     Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/03/2020
    No. 20-10275
    we therefore decline to consider the Moore’s claims without prejudice to
    collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 
    739 F.3d 829
    , 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
    We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
    reflected therein, as well as Moore’s response.      We concur with counsel’s
    assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
    Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
    from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
    5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Moore’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. See
    United States v. Wagner, 
    158 F.3d 901
    , 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-10275

Filed Date: 8/3/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/4/2020