Ronald Drakos, II v. Ed Gonzalez ( 2020 )

Case: 20-20298 Document: 00515604573 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/16/2020
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 16, 2020
No. 20-20298 Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II,
Petitioner—Appellant,
versus
Ed Gonzalez, Harris County Sheriff Department,
Respondent—Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:20-CV-1505
Before Clement, Elrod, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II, a state pre-trial detainee, has moved for a
certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s denial of his
28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The district court determined that Drakos’s Fifth
Amendment challenge to his detention based on COVID-19 concerns was
tantamount to a challenge to the conditions of his confinement, not the fact
*
Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-20298 Document: 00515604573 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/16/2020
No. 20-20298
or duration thereof. Therefore, the court held that 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was the
proper vehicle for Drakos’s challenge.
To obtain a COA, Drakos “must make a substantial showing of the
denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
During the pendency of his COA motion, Drakos was released on a surety
bond, thereby rendering the controversy moot. See Spencer v. Kemna,
523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); Center for Individual Freedom v. Carmouche, 449 F.3d
655, 661 (5th Cir. 2006); McCorvey v. Hill, 385 F.3d 846, 848-49 (5th Cir.
2004). Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED as
moot. The motion for a COA is DENIED as moot.
2