McClanahan v. Wilson ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Case: 21-30106     Document: 00515928385         Page: 1     Date Filed: 07/07/2021
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    July 7, 2021
    No. 21-30106                          Lyle W. Cayce
    Summary Calendar                             Clerk
    Michael McClanahan; Gary Chambers; Eugene Collins,
    Plaintiffs—Appellees,
    versus
    Scott Wilson,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 3:17-CV-1720
    Before Haynes, Willett, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:*
    Defendant Scott Wilson seeks interlocutory review of the denial of his
    motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. He contends that we
    have appellate jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine. Generally, we
    are limited to reviewing “final decisions of the district courts.” 28 U.S.C.
    *
    Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
    Case: 21-30106      Document: 00515928385          Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/07/2021
    No. 21-30106
    § 1291. But under the collateral order doctrine, a district court’s decision is
    immediately appealable if it “(1) conclusively determined the disputed
    question, (2) resolved an important issue separate from the merits of the case,
    and (3) is effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.” In re
    Deepwater Horizon, 
    793 F.3d 479
    , 484 (5th Cir. 2015) (citing Will v. Hallock,
    
    546 U.S. 345
    , 349 (2006)). The doctrine is narrow. Indeed, the Supreme
    Court “has repeatedly stressed that the conditions for appeal under the
    collateral order doctrine are ‘stringent.’” 
    Id.
     This case fails to satisfy the
    third condition because “[t]he question of subject matter jurisdiction is far
    from unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.” Matter of Greene Cnty.
    Hosp., 
    835 F.2d 589
    , 596 (5th Cir. 1988).
    IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of
    jurisdiction.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-30106

Filed Date: 7/7/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/8/2021