Ross Brantley, III v. City of Fort Worth ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •            United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 20-10195
    Summary Calendar
    FILED
    November 17, 2020
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Ross Thomas Brantley, III,                                        Clerk
    Plaintiff—Appellant,
    versus
    City of Fort Worth; Richard A. Henderson; Judge
    Elizabeth Beach,
    Defendants—Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:19-CV-74
    Before Wiener, Southwick, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:*
    Ross Thomas Brantley, III, Texas prisoner # 1851307, filed a 42
    U.S.C. § 1983 complaint asserting claims related to prior state criminal
    proceedings. The district court dismissed the complaint pursuant to 28
    *
    Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
    No. 20-10195
    U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), and it denied a
    postjudgment motion. Brantley now appeals. He has also filed a motion for
    leave to file exhibits, which we grant.
    As a threshold matter, we conclude that Brantley’s notice of appeal is
    timely only with respect to his postjudgment motion and that our jurisdiction
    is therefore limited to reviewing the denial of that motion. See Hamer v.
    Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi., 
    138 S. Ct. 13
    , 16-17 (2017); 28 U.S.C.
    § 2107(a). To the extent that his brief can be liberally construed as addressing
    that denial, Brantley fails to demonstrate that the district court erred. See
    Webb v. Davis, 
    940 F.3d 892
    , 899 (5th Cir. 2019); Norris v. Causey, 
    869 F.3d 360
    , 366 (5th Cir. 2017); Jackson v. FIE Corp., 
    302 F.3d 515
    , 521-22 (5th Cir.
    2002).
    The district court’s dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C.
    § 1915(g), and Brantley has two other strikes based on the dismissal of
    previous civil actions. Because Brantley has accumulated three strikes under
    § 1915(g), he is now barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in any civil
    action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless
    he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).
    AFFIRMED; motion GRANTED; § 1915(g) bar IMPOSED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-10195

Filed Date: 11/17/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/18/2020