-
PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring: For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool I, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. ,
334 P.3d 408(2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal. Parraguirre cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Greene Infuso, LLP Ballard Spahr, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A ea
Document Info
Docket Number: 64580
Filed Date: 11/20/2014
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021