United States v. De Jesus Torres Ponce ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Case: 20-50845     Document: 00515797559         Page: 1     Date Filed: 03/26/2021
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit                              United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    March 26, 2021
    No. 20-50845
    Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    United States of America,
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    Manuel De Jesus Torres Ponce,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 2:18-CR-758-4
    Before Davis, Stewart, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:*
    Manuel De Jesus Torres Ponce appeals the 87-month sentence
    imposed following his guilty plea for conspiring to import five kilograms or
    more of cocaine. The Government requests that the appeal be dismissed
    pursuant to the appeal waiver in Torres Ponce’s plea agreement. Torres
    *
    Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
    Case: 20-50845     Document: 00515797559           Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/26/2021
    No. 20-50845
    Ponce’s opening brief did not address the waiver, and he has not filed a reply
    brief responding to the Government’s argument.
    We review de novo whether an appeal waiver bars an appeal. United
    States v. Keele, 
    755 F.3d 752
    , 754 (5th Cir. 2014). Torres Ponce’s waiver was
    knowing and voluntary as the record shows that he knew he had the right to
    appeal and that he was giving up that right by entering the plea agreement.
    See United States v. Higgins, 
    739 F.3d 733
    , 736 (5th Cir. 2014). Also, the
    waiver plainly applies to his challenge to his sentence. See 
    id.
     Counsel for
    Torres Ponce is cautioned that pursuing an appeal contrary to a valid waiver
    and without responding to the Government’s invocation of the waiver is a
    needless waste of judicial resources and could result in sanctions. See United
    States v. Gaitan, 
    171 F.3d 222
    , 223-24 (5th Cir. 1999).
    The appeal is DISMISSED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-50845

Filed Date: 3/26/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/27/2021