Morris v. United States ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Case: 20-50303      Document: 00515801888         Page: 1     Date Filed: 03/30/2021
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit                            United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    March 30, 2021
    No. 20-50303
    Summary Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    Carol Johnene Morris,
    Petitioner—Appellant,
    versus
    United States of America,
    Respondent—Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 7:20-CV-76
    Before Willett, Ho, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:*
    Carol Johnene Morris, Texas prisoner # 1681899, seeks to proceed in
    forma pauperis (IFP) in her appeal of the district court’s dismissal of her 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
     petition challenging her four 1997 federal firearm-related
    convictions. The district court dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction
    *
    Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
    Case: 20-50303     Document: 00515801888          Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/30/2021
    No. 20-50303
    because Morris was no longer in custody pursuant to the 1997 federal
    convictions.
    To proceed IFP, Morris must demonstrate both financial eligibility
    and a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a); Carson v.
    Polley, 
    689 F.2d 562
    , 586 (5th Cir. 1982). Based on our review of Morris’s
    submissions and the record, she has not demonstrated a nonfrivolous issue
    for appeal with respect to the district court’s determination that it lacked
    jurisdiction over her § 2241 petition. See Howard v. King, 
    707 F.2d 215
    , 220
    (5th Cir. 1983). Therefore, her IFP motion is DENIED, and her appeal is
    DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh v. Taylor, 
    117 F.3d 197
    , 202 & n.24
    (5th Cir. 1997); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
    2