Smith v. Woods ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Case: 20-30480    Document: 00515948250       Page: 1    Date Filed: 07/22/2021
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit                                United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 20-30480                            July 22, 2021
    Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    Donna M. Smith,
    Plaintiff—Appellant,
    versus
    Regina Woods, Officially and Individually; Monique E.
    Barial, Officially and Individually; Bernadette
    D'Souza, Officially; Melvin C. Zeno, Officially and
    Individually; Chanel R. Debose, Individually; Thomas
    Ussin Brown, Individually; Law Office of Chanel R.
    Debose; Sharry I. Sandler, Individually; Law Office of
    Sharry I. Sandler; Gordon S. Patton, Individually,
    Defendants—Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 2:19-CV-14779
    Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Costa, Circuit Judges.
    Case: 20-30480          Document: 00515948250              Page: 2      Date Filed: 07/22/2021
    No. 20-30480
    Per Curiam:*
    Donna Smith appeals the dismissal of her claims brought under a
    variety of legal theories, seeking to redress alleged wrongs arising from her
    divorce proceedings in Louisiana state court. The district court dismissed
    Smith’s federal claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the
    Rooker-Feldman doctrine and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction
    over Smith’s remaining state law claims. 1 In her briefs, Smith reasserts many
    of the allegations in her complaint, but she fails to offer a reasoned argument
    for how the district court erred in concluding that it lacked jurisdiction over
    her claims. Our independent assessment of the district court’s ruling reveals
    no error in that conclusion. 2 We affirm.
    *
    Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
    1
    See Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 
    263 U.S. 413
     (1923); D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman,
    
    460 U.S. 462
     (1983).
    2
    See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp., 
    544 U.S. 280
    , 284 (2005).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-30480

Filed Date: 7/22/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/22/2021