Furley v. Aledo ISD ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FIFTH CIRCUIT
    _________________
    No. 99-11263
    (Summary Calendar)
    _________________
    KATHERINE FURLEY,
    also known as Katherine
    Hackleman,
    Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee,
    TIM DEAN, Individually and
    as next friend on behalf of
    James Randolph Dean,
    Movant-Appellant,
    versus
    ALEDO INDEPENDENT
    SCHOOL DISTRICT,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    Appeals from the United States District Court
    For the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:99-CV-416-A
    May 23, 2000
    Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Katherine Furley appeals the district court’s dismissal of her 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     suit for failure to state a
    claim. The district court did not err in dismissing Furley’s suit. See Doe v. Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist., 
    168 F.3d 806
    , 819-22 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. granted, 
    120 S. Ct. 494
     (1999). The district court also did not abuse its
    discretion in denying her motion to amend her complaint, as her claims were foreclosed by Doe and thus were
    futile. See Leffall v. Dallas Indep. Sch. Dist., 
    28 F.3d 521
    , 524 (5th Cir. 1994). Because Furley’s suit was
    dismissed, the district court also did not err in denying as moot Tim Dean’s motion to intervene in the suit. See
    Flory v. United States, 
    79 F.3d 24
    , 26 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
    AFFIRMED.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
    published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    -2-