United States v. Shepherd , 87 F. App'x 978 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  February 18, 2004
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 02-21342
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    KENNETH WAYNE SHEPHERD,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. H-02-CR-184-ALL
    --------------------
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Kenneth Shepherd appeals from a bench-trial conviction
    for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of
    18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 942(a).    Shepherd argues that
    18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is an overly broad assertion of Commerce
    Clause power that unconstitutionally burdens the Second Amendment
    right to bear arms.   Shepherd further argues that 18 U.S.C.
    § 922(g)(1) violates the Equal Protection Clause.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 02-21342
    -2-
    Shepherd’s arguments are foreclosed by this court’s holding
    in United States v. Darrington, 
    351 F.3d 632
    (5th Cir. 2003).
    Shepherd also challenges his 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)
    conviction as a violation of the Commerce Clause and the Tenth
    Amendment.   He argues that the Government did not produce
    evidence that the firearm was in or substantially affected
    interstate commerce.   Shepherd concedes that these arguments are
    foreclosed by this court’s holding in United States v. Daugherty,
    
    264 F.3d 513
    , 518 & n.12 (5th Cir. 2001), but he seeks to
    preserve the issue for Supreme Court review.   The judgment of the
    district court is AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-21342

Citation Numbers: 87 F. App'x 978

Judges: Emilio, Garza, Higginbotham, Per Curiam, Prado

Filed Date: 2/17/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/1/2023