Margarito Rodas Lopez v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 585 F. App'x 673 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                              NOT FOR PUBLICATION
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         FILED
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                         NOV 24 2014
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    MARGARITO LUCAS RODAS-LOPEZ,                     No. 11-70391
    Petitioner,                        Agency No. A095-605-013
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted November 18, 2014**
    Before:       LEAVY, FISHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    Margarito Lucas Rodas-Lopez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions
    for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his
    appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for
    withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review
    for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009), and we deny the petition for review.
    Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that even though
    Rodas-Lopez suffered past persecution by guerrillas in 1992, his presumption of a
    fear of future persecution was rebutted by evidence of a fundamental change in
    circumstances in Guatemala based on the 1996 peace accords between the
    guerrillas and the Guatemalan government. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(b)(1)(i)(A);
    see also Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 
    336 F.3d 995
    , 1000-01 (9th Cir. 2003)
    (upholding BIA’s finding that petitioner’s presumption was rebutted). We reject
    Rodas-Lopez’s contention that the BIA failed to conduct an individualized analysis
    of how the changed circumstances affected his specific situation. See Sowe v.
    Mukasey, 
    538 F.3d 1281
    , 1286 (9th Cir. 2008). In light of our conclusions, we do
    not reach Rodas-Lopez’s contention regarding his brother and brother-in-law.
    Finally, we reject Rodas-Lopez’s contention that the BIA erred in its discussion of
    the 2003 incident at his parents’ home. Rodas-Lopez did not argue, and does not
    contend before the court, that the 2003 incident was “closely tied” to his
    mistreatment by guerrillas in 1992. See Arriaga-Barrientos v. INS, 
    937 F.2d 411
    ,
    414 (9th Cir. 1991).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    2                                  11-70391
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-70391

Citation Numbers: 585 F. App'x 673

Filed Date: 11/24/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023