United States v. Hernandez-Guerrero ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 22-20469         Document: 00516745475             Page: 1      Date Filed: 05/10/2023
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit
    ____________                      United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 22-20469                        May 10, 2023
    Summary Calendar
    ____________                         Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    United States of America,
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    Carlos Etcheverry Hernandez-Guerrero,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    ______________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:21-CR-535-1
    ______________________________
    Before Stewart, Dennis, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:*
    Carlos Etcheverry Hernandez-Guerrero appeals the sentence
    imposed following his guilty plea conviction for reentry of a removed alien.
    He contends, and the Government agrees, that the written judgment must be
    corrected because it contains a condition of supervised release that conflicts
    with the district court’s oral pronouncement of his sentence.
    _____________________
    *
    This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
    Case: 22-20469      Document: 00516745475          Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/10/2023
    No. 22-20469
    We agree with the parties that the written condition requiring
    Hernandez-Guerrero to submit to, and pay for, substance-abuse testing to
    determine if he has used a prohibited substance and prohibiting him from
    tampering with the testing methods is a discretionary condition under
    
    18 U.S.C. § 3583
    (d) that the district court did not pronounce as required at
    sentencing. See United States v. Diggles, 
    957 F.3d 551
    , 559-63 (5th Cir. 2020)
    (en banc). That condition materially differs from the oral pronouncement
    and must be excised from the written judgment. See United States v. Prado,
    
    53 F.4th 316
    , 318-19 (5th Cir. 2022); United States v. Perez-Espinoza, 
    31 F.4th 988
    , 989 (5th Cir. 2022).
    Accordingly, we VACATE in part and REMAND to the district
    court to amend the written judgment to conform with the oral
    pronouncement, consistent with this opinion. In all other respects, the
    judgment is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-20469

Filed Date: 5/10/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 5/11/2023