River Glider Ave Trust v. US Bank ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                 REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND
    REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings
    consistent with this order.
    Hardest"
    Douglas
    CHERRY, J., concurring:
    For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
    U.S. Bank, N.A.,   130 Nev. , 
    334 P.3d 408
    (2014), dissent, I disagree
    that respondent U.S. Bank lost its lien priority by virtue of the
    homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize,
    however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly,
    concur in the disposition of this appeal.
    cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge
    Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd.
    Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A    e41,
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 63615

Filed Date: 11/24/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021