Jerome McFadden v. S. Lewis , 585 F. App'x 270 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-6962
    JEROME MCFADDEN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    S. B. LEWIS, Associate Warden; FRANK MURSIER, Major McCI; L.
    CARTELEDGE,   Warden   at    McCI   McCormick   Correctional
    Institution,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill.    Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
    (0:12-cv-01627-MGL-PJG)
    Submitted:   November 20, 2014            Decided:   November 25, 2014
    Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam.
    Jerome McFadden, Appellant Pro Se.    Brandon Paul Jones, Daniel
    Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, PA,
    Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jerome McFadden seeks to appeal the district court’s
    text order denying his motion seeking reconsideration of several
    nondispositive orders issued by the magistrate judge, including
    orders denying his motions for appointment of counsel and for an
    extension of time to complete discovery, and an order granting
    in    part   and     denying   in     part        McFadden’s      motion    to     stay
    Defendants’ summary judgment motion.                    This court may exercise
    jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012),
    and   certain      interlocutory      and       collateral      orders,    28    U.S.C.
    § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
    Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949).                        The order McFadden
    seeks   to   appeal    is   neither    a        final   order   nor   an   appealable
    interlocutory or collateral order.                  Accordingly, we dismiss the
    appeal for lack of jurisdiction.                 We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-6962

Citation Numbers: 585 F. App'x 270

Filed Date: 11/25/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023