United States v. Patience Okoroji ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 18-11371      Document: 00514970642         Page: 1    Date Filed: 05/24/2019
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 18-11371                             May 24, 2019
    Conference Calendar
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    PATIENCE OKOROJI,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:15-CR-559-1
    Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    The attorney appointed to represent Patience Okoroji has moved for
    leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
    
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
    632 F.3d 229
    (5th Cir. 2011).
    Okoroji has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
    relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
    assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-11371    Document: 00514970642    Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/24/2019
    No. 18-11371
    Our review reveals a clerical error in the written judgment concerning
    the amount of restitution. The judgment correctly states that the amount of
    restitution is $8,650,705.82 but also erroneously states the amount of
    restitution is $8,650,785.82.    The order setting additional conditions of
    supervised release also reflects the erroneous amount of restitution.
    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
    counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
    DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. This matter is REMANDED for the limited
    purpose of correcting the clerical error in the judgment and the order setting
    additional conditions of supervised release. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36; United
    States v. Johnson, 
    588 F.2d 961
    , 964 (5th Cir. 1979).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-11371

Filed Date: 5/24/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 5/24/2019