Stone v. Bortz , 85 S.W.3d 69 ( 2002 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Joseph Stone and Joshua Stone (collectively “Plaintiffs”) appeal the judgment in favor of defendants Jonathan Bortz, Kent Wehmeier and Endocrine Associates, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) following a jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).