Zalecky v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                                   CORRECTED
    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 20-471V
    UNPUBLISHED
    ROBYN ZALECKY,                                              Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                            Filed: October 4, 2021
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                            Administration (SIRVA)
    Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for
    Petitioner.
    Lynn Christina Schlie, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
    On April 20, 2020, Robyn Zalecky filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) after an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on October 10,
    2018. Petition at ¶1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office
    of Special Masters.
    On August 10, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled
    to compensation for her SIRVA. On October 1, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer on award
    of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $98,689.47,
    comprised of $97,500.00 for pain and suffering and $1,189.47 for actual reimbursable
    1  Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    expenses. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with
    the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled
    to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $98,689.47 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount
    represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    )
    ROBYN ZALECKY,                                     )
    )
    Petitioner,                       )
    )    No. 20-471V
    v.                                                 )    Chief Special Master Corcoran
    )    ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN                      )
    SERVICES,                                          )
    )
    Respondent.                       )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On August 9, 2021, respondent conceded that entitlement to compensation was
    appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. ECF No. 24. On August 10, 2021, Chief
    Special Master Corcoran issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to
    vaccine compensation for her Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”).
    ECF No. 26.
    I.        Items of Compensation
    Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
    $98,689.47. The award is comprised of the following: $97,500.00 for pain and suffering and
    $1,189.47 for actual unreimbursable expenses. This amount represents all elements of
    compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner
    agrees.
    II.       Form of the Award
    The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through
    a lump sum payment of $98,689.47, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner
    agrees.
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respectfully submitted,
    BRIAN M. BOYNTON
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    DARRYL R. WISHARD
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/ LYNN C. SCHLIE
    Lynn C. Schlie
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 616-3667
    Fax: (202) 616-4310
    Dated: October 1, 2021
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-471

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 11/4/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/4/2021