Brown v. Brown ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •             IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    CORA BROWN,1                                §
    §   No. 372, 2021
    Petitioner Below,                     §
    Appellant,                            §   Court Below—Family Court of
    §   the State of Delaware
    v.                                    §
    §   File No. CN96-11425
    CHASE BROWN,                                §   Petition No. 20-22569
    §
    Respondent Below,                     §
    Appellee.                             §
    Submitted: December 2, 2021
    Decided: December 21, 2021
    Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.
    ORDER
    Upon consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant’s response,
    it appears to the Court that:
    (1)    On November 22, 2021, the appellant, Cora Brown, filed a notice of
    appeal from a Family Court order dated October 18, 2021 and docketed on October
    19, 2021. A timely notice of appeal was due in this Court by November 18, 2021.2
    The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Brown to show cause why this
    appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed. In her response to the notice to
    1
    The Court assigns pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
    2
    Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(i).
    show cause, Brown argues the merits of her appeal, but does not address the
    untimeliness of her appeal in this Court.
    (2)    Time is a jurisdictional requirement.3 A notice of appeal must be
    received by the Court within the applicable time period in order to be effective.4 An
    appellant’s pro se status does not excuse a failure to comply strictly with the
    jurisdictional requirements.5 Unless an appellant can demonstrate that the failure to
    file a timely notice of appeal is attributable to court-related personnel, this Court
    cannot consider an untimely appeal.6
    (3)    Brown has not demonstrated that her failure to file a timely notice of
    appeal of the Family Court order is attributable to court-related personnel.
    Consequently, this case does not fall within the exception to the general rule that
    mandates the timely filing of a notice of appeal. The appeal must be dismissed.
    NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 29(b),
    that this appeal is DISMISSED.
    BY THE COURT:
    /s/ Karen L. Valihura
    Justice
    3
    Carr v. State, 
    554 A.2d 778
    , 779 (Del.1989).
    4
    Supr. Ct. R. 10(a).
    5
    Ward v. Taylor, 
    2019 WL 4784943
    , at *1 (Del. Sept. 30, 2019); Smith v. State, 
    47 A.3d 481
    , 486-
    87 (Del. 2012).
    6
    Ward, 
    2019 WL 4784943
    , at *1; Bey v. State, 
    402 A.2d 362
    , 363 (Del. 1979).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 372, 2021

Judges: Valihura J.

Filed Date: 12/21/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/22/2021