Matter of Swartz v. Absolut Center for Nursing and Rehab , 30 N.Y.S.3d 592 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                           State of New York
    Supreme Court, Appellate Division
    Third Judicial Department
    Decided and Entered: May 19, 2016                      521578
    ________________________________
    In the Matter of the Claim of
    DONNA SWARTZ,
    Claimant,
    v
    ABSOLUT CENTER FOR NURSING AND              MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    REHAB et al.,
    Appellants.
    WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD,
    Respondent.
    ________________________________
    Calendar Date:   April 20, 2016
    Before:   Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Devine, Clark and Mulvey, JJ.
    __________
    Law Offices of Melissa A. Day, PLLC, Amherst (Ellen
    Shanahan Becker of counsel), for appellants.
    Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City
    (Donya Fernandez of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board,
    respondent.
    __________
    Devine, J.
    Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board,
    filed October 23, 2014, which ruled that claimant sustained an
    accidental injury arising out of and in the course of her
    employment.
    Immediately following the end of her shift, claimant was in
    the employer's parking lot and tripped on a trailer hitch on her
    parked car. She fell and sustained injuries to her right elbow
    -2-                521578
    and both hands. Claimant subsequently applied for workers'
    compensation benefits. The employer and its workers'
    compensation carrier controverted the claim, and, following a
    hearing, a Workers' Compensation Law Judge found that claimant
    sustained a work-related injury and awarded benefits. The
    Workers' Compensation Board affirmed, and this appeal ensued.
    We affirm. "To be compensable under the Workers'
    Compensation Law, an injury must have arisen both out of and in
    the course of a claimant's employment" (Matter of McFarland v
    Lindy's Taxi, Inc., 49 AD3d 1111, 1112 [2008] [citations
    omitted]; accord Matter of Panarella v JP Hogan Coring & Sawing
    Corp., 78 AD3d 1470, 1471 [2010]; see Workers' Compensation Law
    § 10 [1]). Moreover, "[w]hile on the employer's premises, going
    to or coming from work is generally considered an incident of the
    employment" (Sicktish v Vulcan Indus. of Buffalo, 33 AD2d 975,
    976 [1970]; accord Matter of Panarella v JP Hogan Coring & Sawing
    Corp., 78 AD3d at 1471; see Matter of Mercado v Schenectady City
    School Dist., 24 AD3d 846, 847 [2005]).
    Here, the record reveals that claimant tripped and fell in
    the employer's parking lot as she was preparing to leave at the
    end of her shift. Thus, there is substantial evidence in the
    record to support the Board's determination that claimant's
    injury arose out of and in the course of her employment (see
    Matter of Mercado v Schenectady City School Dist., 24 AD3d at
    847; Matter of Camino v Chappaqua Transp., 19 AD3d 856, 856-857
    [2005]; Matter of Evans v J.W. Mays, Inc., 25 AD2d 597, 598
    [1966], lv denied 17 NY2d 423 [1966]).
    Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Clark and Mulvey, JJ., concur.
    -3-                  521578
    ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
    ENTER:
    Robert D. Mayberger
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 521578

Citation Numbers: 139 A.D.3d 1292, 30 N.Y.S.3d 592

Filed Date: 5/19/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023