Wells v. Howard , 139 A.D. 912 ( 1910 )


Menu:
  • The verdict was against the weight of the evidence and for that reason the judgment and order are reversed .and a new trial granted, on condition that the plaintiff pay-the costs of the trial and disbursements-tódáte, Woodward, Jenks, Burr and Carr, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., dissented as to defendant William J. Howard.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 139 A.D. 912

Filed Date: 6/15/1910

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023