McNeill v. Kenworthy , 267 F. App'x 206 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-7104
    CORY LEE MCNEILL,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    GEORGE KENWORTHY,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.   James C Dever III,
    District Judge. (5:06-hc-02177-D)
    Submitted:   December 19, 2007             Decided:   January 22, 2008
    Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Cory Lee McNeill, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Cory Lee McNeill, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the
    district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under
    
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000).        An appeal may not be taken from the final
    order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge
    issues a certificate of appealability.                 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1)
    (2000).    A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims
    addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the
    denial of a constitutional right.”            
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2) (2000).
    A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable
    jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of his
    constitutional      claims     is   debatable     or     wrong    and    that   any
    dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also
    debatable or wrong.      See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 338
    (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,
    
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683 (4th Cir. 2001).            We have independently reviewed
    the record and conclude that McNeill has not made the requisite
    showing.      Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
    dismiss the appeal.          We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts   and    legal   contentions    are     adequately    presented      in   the
    materials     before   the    court   and     argument    would    not    aid   the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-7104

Citation Numbers: 267 F. App'x 206

Judges: Duncan, Michael, Per Curiam, Shedd

Filed Date: 1/22/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/7/2023