Darling v. Miller , 54 Barb. 149 ( 1869 )

Cardozo, J.

I think the letter was competent, not as proof of the truth of the facts stated in it, but to show under what cover its contents reached the plaintiffs—precisely as an envelope would be admissible as having contained a certain letter.

I think the judgment should be affirmed.

Geo. G. Barnard, J., concurred.