Horowitz v. Harris , 129 Misc. 236 ( 1927 )

Per Curiam.

The complaint in the prior action did not allege facts warranting the imprisonment of the plaintiff’s husband under body execution. (Segelken v. Meyer, 94 N. Y. 473; Lange v. Schile, 111 App. Div. 613; All-Package G. Stores Co. v. McAtamney, 174 id. 778.)

Delehanty and Lydon, JJ., concur; Levy, J., dissents, with opinion.