Kevin Lamont Garden v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed April 3, 2015.
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-13-01507-CR
    KEVIN LAMONT GARDEN, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. F10-57354-S
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Lang, Stoddart, and Schenck
    Opinion by Justice Schenck
    Kevin Lamont Garden appeals his conviction, following the adjudication of his guilt, for
    aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. In a single issue, appellant contends the trial court’s
    judgment should be modified to delete the fine. The State agrees the fine should be deleted from
    the judgment. We modify the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt and affirm as modified.
    Appellant waived a jury and pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon,
    a firearm. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.03(a)(2) (West 2011). The trial court deferred
    adjudicating guilt, placed appellant on seven years’ community supervision, and assessed a
    $2,500 fine.   The State later moved to adjudicate guilt, alleging appellant violated several
    conditions of his community supervision. Following a hearing at which appellant pleaded true to
    the allegations, the trial court adjudicated appellant guilty of aggravated robbery with a deadly
    weapon and assessed punishment at twelve years’ imprisonment. The trial judge did not orally
    pronounce a fine. The trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt, however, includes a $2,500 fine.
    When a variation between the oral pronouncement of the sentence and the written
    memorialization of the sentence exists, the oral pronouncement controls. See Coffey v. State, 
    979 S.W.2d 326
    , 329 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); see also McCoy v. State, 
    81 S.W.3d 917
    , 919 (Tex.
    App.—Dallas 2002, pet. ref’d). We sustain appellant’s sole issue. We modify the judgment
    adjudicating guilt to delete the fine. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 
    865 S.W.2d 26
    ,
    27–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 
    813 S.W.2d 526
    , 529–30 (Tex. App.—Dallas
    1991, pet. ref'd).
    As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.
    /David J. Schenck/
    DAVID J. SCHENCK
    JUSTICE
    Do Not Publish
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47
    131507F.U05
    -2-
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    KEVIN LAMONT GARDEN, Appellant                      Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District
    Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
    No. 05-13-01507-CR        V.                        F10-57354-S).
    Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck,
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                        Justices Lang and Stoddart participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is
    MODIFIED as follows:
    The section entitled “Fine” is modified to show “None.”
    As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.
    Judgment entered April 3, 2015.
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-13-01507-CR

Filed Date: 4/3/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016