United States v. Williams ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 95-40452
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JOE WILLIAMS, JR.,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:94-CR-108-1
    - - - - - - - - - -
    May 7, 1996
    Before KING, JOLLY and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Joe Williams, Jr., appeals his conviction for conspiracy to
    possess with intent to distribute cocaine.   Williams has not
    shown that either of his confessions to Special Agent King or to
    Officer Alldredge were not voluntary.    United States v.
    Broussard, ___ F.3d ___, (5th Cir. Apr. 4, 1996,   No. 94-20685),
    
    1996 WL 159176
     at *5 (“A confession is voluntary if, under the
    totality of the circumstances, the statement is the accused’s
    *
    Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
    47.5.4.
    No. 95-40452
    -2-
    free and rational choice.”)   Williams has not shown that the
    confession made to Special Agent King was inadmissible because of
    a delay in presentment to a magistrate judge.   See United States
    v. Alvarez-Sanchez, 
    114 S. Ct. 1599
    , 1604-05 (1994).
    The other evidence in the case is sufficient to support his
    conviction because it corroborated his confessions.    United
    States v. Laury, 
    49 F.3d 145
    , 151 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    116 S. Ct. 162
     (1995); United States v. Ayala, 
    887 F.2d 62
    , 67 (5th
    Cir. 1989); Opper v. United States, 
    348 U.S. 84
    , 93 (1954).
    Williams has not demonstrated that the district court
    plainly erred in either its instruction to the jury concerning
    reasonable doubt or its charge to the jury under   Allen v. United
    States, 
    164 U.S. 492
    , 501-02 (1896).   See United States v.
    Calverley, 
    37 F.3d 160
    , 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc) (citing
    United States v. Olano, 
    507 U.S. 725
    , 731-37 (1993)), cert.
    denied, 
    115 S. Ct. 1266
     (1995); United States v.Alonzo, 
    681 F.2d 997
     (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    459 U.S. 1021
     (1982).
    AFFIRMED.