Jestine Washington v. South State Bank ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 18-1397
    JESTINE DELORES WASHINGTON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    SOUTH STATE BANK; FED. COURT; AT&T; COMCAST; DIRECT TV;
    DOBSON & PEST CONTROL D-Z,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
    Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:17-cv-03464-RMG)
    Submitted: July 9, 2018                                           Decided: July 27, 2018
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jestine Delores Washington, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jestine Delores Washington seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing
    her complaint and denying reconsideration. The district court referred this case to a
    magistrate judge pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge
    recommended that relief be denied and advised Washington that failure to file timely
    objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order
    based upon the recommendation.
    The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is
    necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the
    parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 
    766 F.2d 841
    , 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 
    474 U.S. 140
     (1985).
    Washington has waived appellate review by failing to timely file objections after
    receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny Washington’s motion to seal the informal
    brief and dismiss the appeal.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-1397

Filed Date: 7/27/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/27/2018