United States v. Ricky Lamb , 62 F. App'x 747 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 02-3202
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the Western
    * District of Arkansas.
    Ricky Ellis Lamb,                       *
    *     [Unpublished]
    Appellant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: May 5, 2003
    Filed: May 9, 2003
    ___________
    Before MURPHY, HANSEN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    In this direct criminal appeal, Ricky Ellis Lamb challenges the sentence the
    district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to failing to appear for service of
    sentence, in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 3146
    (a)(2). The district court sentenced him to
    21 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised release. On appeal, Lamb’s counsel
    has moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), raising two
    1
    The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the
    Western District of Arkansas.
    issues: the district court erroneously denied Lamb (1) credit for time served on
    previous federal convictions, and (2) a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.11.
    We conclude that the district court did not err in denying Lamb’s request for
    credit to account for time that he served on previous federal sentences which he
    claims should have been run concurrently to then undischarged state sentences. We
    also conclude that the district court made a discretionary decision not to depart, which
    is unreviewable. See United States v. Edwards, 
    225 F.3d 991
    , 992 (8th Cir. 2000),
    cert. denied, 
    531 U.S. 1100
     (2001).
    Following careful review of the record, we find no other nonfrivolous issues.
    See Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80 (1988). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
    We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-3202

Citation Numbers: 62 F. App'x 747

Filed Date: 5/9/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023