Garrett v. Norris , 82 F. App'x 870 ( 2003 )

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 9, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-10440
Conference Calendar
TRACEY DEMARK GARRETT,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CHUCK NORRIS, also known as Carlos Ray Norris;
AARON NORRIS; BOB GORKIN; MORRIS BROTHERS; CLERANCE GILYARD,
ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:01-CV-1566-D
--------------------
Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Tracey Garrett, federal prisoner no. 31079-077, appeals the
dismissal as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A of
his action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Garrett
alleged that actor Chuck Norris and numerous employees of the
television show “Walker, Texas Ranger” violated his civil rights
by acting as federal law enforcement officers, arresting and
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-10440
-2-
harassing him on camera, and causing humiliating photographs of
him to be published in People magazine.
Garrett’s action is time-barred and was properly dismissed
as frivolous. See Gonzales v. Wyatt, 157 F.3d 1016, 1019-20
(5th Cir. 1998). In addition, Garrett’s attempts to argue on
appeal for tolling the limitation period or beginning it at a
later date lack any arguable merit. Accordingly, this appeal is
DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20
(5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
The district court’s dismissal and the dismissal of this
appeal as frivolous both count as strikes for the purposes of
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383,
385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). We caution Garrett that once he
accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis
in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated
unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED; THREE-STRIKES WARNING ISSUED.