United States v. Kissi , 235 F. App'x 118 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 04-5105
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DAVID M. KISSI; EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI,
    Defendants - Appellants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (03-
    cr-473-PJM)
    Submitted:   July 9, 2007                 Decided:   August 2, 2007
    Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    David M. Kissi, Edith Truvillion Kissi, Appellants Pro Se.
    Christopher Bowman Mead, LONDON & MEAD, Washington, D.C., for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    David M. Kissi and Edith Truvillion Kissi seek to appeal
    the district court’s order finding them in criminal contempt and
    imposing sentences upon them.               Subsequent to the filing of the
    Kissis’       notice   of   appeal,   the    district    court    vacated   their
    sentences and referred the matter to the United States Attorney’s
    Office.       It does not appear that further action has been taken
    either by the United States Attorney’s Office or the district
    court.
    This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
    orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
     (2000), and certain interlocutory and
    collateral orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
     (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
    Cohen    v.    Beneficial    Indus.   Loan    Corp.,    
    337 U.S. 541
       (1949).
    Because the district court vacated the sentences imposed upon the
    Kissis, the order they seek to appeal is neither a final order nor
    an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.                 Accordingly, we
    dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-5105

Citation Numbers: 235 F. App'x 118

Judges: Hamilton, Per Curiam, Shedd, Wilkinson

Filed Date: 8/2/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/7/2023