State v. Arnold , 469 S.W.3d 490 ( 2015 )

ORDER

Per curiam:

Appellant Ricky Arnold (“Arnold”) was convicted by a jury of attempted enticement of a child in violation of Section 566.151. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum explaining our decision has been provided to the parties.